4.8 Article

Notch1 regulates the initiation of metastasis and self-renewal of Group 3 medulloblastoma

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06564-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pew Latin American Fellowship
  2. Price Family Charitable Fund
  3. Center for Children's Brain Tumors
  4. American Brain Tumor Foundation
  5. Matthew Larson Foundation for Pediatric Brain Tumors
  6. Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  7. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health
  8. Child Health Research Institute at Stanford Tashia
  9. John Morgridge Faculty Scholarship in Pediatric Translational Medicine NIH-NCATS-CTSA [UL1 TR001085]
  10. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) [P-91650709]
  11. Canadian NSERC Discovery Grant [RGPIN-2016-06485]
  12. Cancer Research Society of Canada [21089]
  13. [R01 NS096368-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood. Group 3 medulloblastoma, the most aggressive molecular subtype, frequently disseminates through the leptomeningeal cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) spaces in the brain and spinal cord. The mechanism of dissemination through the CSF remains poorly understood, and the molecular pathways involved in medulloblastoma metastasis and self-renewal are largely unknown. Here we show that NOTCH1 signaling pathway regulates both the initiation of metastasis and the self-renewal of medulloblastoma. We identify a mechanism in which NOTCH1 activates BMI1 through the activation of TWIST1. NOTCH1 expression and activity are directly related to medulloblastoma metastasis and decreased survival rate of tumor-bearing mice. Finally, medulloblastoma-bearing mice intrathecally treated with anti-NRR1, a NOTCH1 blocking antibody, present lower frequency of spinal metastasis and higher survival rate. These findings identify NOTCH1 as a pivotal driver of Group 3 medulloblastoma metastasis and self-renewal, supporting the development of therapies targeting this pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据