4.8 Article

CHD3 helicase domain mutations cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome with macrocephaly and impaired speech and language

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06014-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation Grant [24.001.006]
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant [DC000496]
  4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [U54 HD090256]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-119595, PJT-148830]
  6. Health Innovation Challenge Fund [HICF-1009-003]
  7. Wellcome Trust
  8. Department of Health
  9. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute [WT098051, GEN/284/12]
  10. National Institute for Health Research through Comprehensive Clinical Research Network
  11. Cambridge South REC [10/H0305/83]
  12. Republic of Ireland REC [GEN/284/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromatin remodeling is of crucial importance during brain development. Pathogenic alterations of several chromatin remodeling ATPases have been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders. We describe an index case with a de novo missense mutation in CHD3, identified during whole genome sequencing of a cohort of children with rare speech disorders. To gain a comprehensive view of features associated with disruption of this gene, we use a genotype-driven approach, collecting and characterizing 35 individuals with de novo CHD3 mutations and overlapping phenotypes. Most mutations cluster within the ATPase/helicase domain of the encoded protein. Modeling their impact on the three-dimensional structure demonstrates disturbance of critical binding and interaction motifs. Experimental assays with six of the identified mutations show that a subset directly affects ATPase activity, and all but one yield alterations in chromatin remodeling. We implicate de novo CHD3 mutations in a syndrome characterized by intellectual disability, macrocephaly, and impaired speech and language.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据