4.7 Article

Inhibition of inflammasome activation by a clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae impairs efferocytosis and leads to bacterial dissemination

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-1214-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2011/17611-7, 2013/18039-0, 2017/19870-6, 2017/19265-5]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [302097/2010-4, 471945/2012-9, 305535/2014-5, 116820/2016-0, 159637/2017-1]
  3. Coordination of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  4. [PROPG/UNESP - 05/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative bacterium responsible for severe cases of nosocomial pneumonia. During the infectious process, both neutrophils and monocytes migrate to the site of infection, where they carry out their effector functions and can be affected by different patterns of cell death. Our data show that clinical strains of K. pneumoniae have dissimilar mechanisms for surviving within macrophages; these mechanisms include modulation of microbicidal mediators and cell death. The A28006 strain induced high IL-1 beta production and pyroptotic cell death in macrophages; by contrast, the A54970 strain induced high IL-10 production and low IL-1 beta production by macrophages. Pyroptotic cell death induced by the A28006 strain leads to a significant increase in bacterial sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, and efferocytosis of the pyroptotic cells results in efficient bacterial clearance both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, the A54970 strain was able to inhibit inflammasome activation and pyroptotic cell death by inducing IL-10 production. Here, for the first time, we present a K. pneumoniae strain able to inhibit inflammasome activation, leading to bacterial survival and dissemination in the host. The understanding of possible escape mechanisms is essential in the search for alternative treatments against multidrug-resistant bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据