4.5 Article

Isolation and characterization of aerobic, culturable, arsenic-tolerant bacteria from lead-zinc mine tailing in southern China

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-018-2557-x

关键词

As-resistant bacteria; As pollution; Oxidation; Reduction; 16S rRNA analysis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016JX03, YX2014-15]
  2. National Science and Technology Ministry [2012BAC09B03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [J1310005]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [2011033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioremediation of arsenic (As) pollution is an important environmental issue. The present investigation was carried out to isolate As-resistant novel bacteria and characterize their As transformation and tolerance ability. A total of 170 As-resistant bacteria were isolated from As-contaminated soils at the Kangjiawan lead-zinc tailing mine, located in Hunan Province, southern China. Thirteen As-resistant isolates were screened by exposure to 260mM Na(2)HAsO(4)7H(2)O, most of which showed a very high level of resistance to As5+ (MIC600mM) and As3+ (MIC10mM). Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes indicated that the 13 isolates tested belong to the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and these isolates were assigned to eight genera, Bacillus, Williamsia, Citricoccus, Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, Ochrobactrum, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas. Genes involved in As resistance were present in 11 of the isolates. All 13 strains transformed As (1mM); the oxidation and reduction rates were 5-30% and 10-51.2% within 72h, respectively. The rates of oxidation by Bacillus sp. Tw1 and Pseudomonas spp. Tw224 peaked at 42.48 and 34.94% at 120h, respectively. For Pseudomonas spp. Tw224 and Bacillus sp. Tw133, the highest reduction rates were 52.01% at 48h and 48.66% at 144h, respectively. Our findings will facilitate further research into As metabolism and bioremediation of As pollution by genome sequencing and genes modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据