4.5 Article

Removal of Cr(VI) by magnetic Fe/C crosslinked nanoparticle for water purification: rapid contaminant removal property and mechanism of action

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 78, 期 10, 页码 2171-2182

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.497

关键词

Cr(VI); efficient removal; electron transfer; MNZVI/CNTs-OH nanoparticles; wastewater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804353]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Science Foundation for Youths) [2018JJ3885]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018JJ4010]
  4. Key R&D Program of Hunan Province [2018SK2044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel method based on the magnetic Fe/C crosslinked nanoparticles (MNZVI/CNTs-OH) is reported for the effective removal of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions. Parameters that influence the effectiveness of the nanoparticles, such as pH, temperature, reaction time, and particle dosage, was analyzed. It was found that MNZVI/CNTs-OH particles exhibit significantly higher activity toward Cr(VI) removal than bare NZVI, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and other synthetic nanomaterials. Under optimized conditions, the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) by MNZVI/CNTs-OH is up to 98% with an initial contaminant concentration of 50 mg/L, and chromium content in the residue up to 48 mg/g. Physical characterizations, including Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and TG-TD measurements, provide insights into the working mechanism of Cr(VI) purification. Our findings suggest that immobilization of MNZVI onto carbon nanotubes increase the covalent bond property, while crosslinked nanoparticles (NPs) provide the electron transfer passage from the NZVI surface and improves the dispersity of the MNZVI, thus enhancing the performance. These results demonstrate the potential of the MNZVI/CNTs-OH nanoparticles for the rapid and efficient treatment of Cr(VI)-containing wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据