4.7 Article

Organization and differentiation of breeding bird communities across a forested to urban landscape

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 242-250

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.007

关键词

Bird diversity; Indicator species; Urbanization; Urban dwellers; Forest species; Eastern Mediterranean

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As rates of urbanization are increasing, knowledge of the ecology of bird communities and how they vary in transition zones between natural and urban areas would provide critical data to help enhance bird diversity. The organization and differentiation of breeding bird communities were studied in the peri-urban forest, forest ecotone and urban greenspaces of a small coastal Mediterranean city (Kavala, Greece). A total of 49 species, 12 threatened within Europe, were observed; 32 in urban greenspaces, 42 in the ecotone and 39 in the peri-urban forest. Overall abundance was higher and evenness lower in the city than the ecotone and the forest. Species richness was lower in the city than the ecotone. Ordination indicated significant differentiation among communities, with similarity being higher between the forest and the ecotone and lower between the city and the forest. Indicator species analysis determined 14 indicator species; 5 of urban greenspaces (urban dwellers), 1 of the forest ecotone (urban avoider), 1 of the peri-urban forest (avoider), 2 of the city and the ecotone (dwellers/ utilizers) and 5 of the forest and the ecotone (avoiders). Urban dwellers accounted for 68% of the total abundance of urban greenspaces, however homogenization was counterbalanced by the influx of forest species (urban utilizers). Results revealed the diversity, structure and important associations of urban and peri-urban bird communities. Urban plans should incorporate measures to provide suitable breeding habitat to both threatened urban dwellers and forest species to enhance their populations, thus increasing biodiversity and promoting the well-being of urban residents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据