4.7 Article

Fundamental studies of ultrasonic melt processing

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 455-467

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.12.028

关键词

Aluminium; In situ characterisation; Acoustic pressure; Acoustic streaming; Ultrasonic melt processing; Structure refinement; Heterogeneous nucleation; Fragmentation; De-agglomeration

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/K005804/1, EP/K00588X/1, EP/I02249X/1, EP/L019884/1, EP/L019825/1, EP/L019965/1, EP/R011001/1, EP/R011095/1, EP/R011044/1]
  2. EU [286344, 606090, NMP3-LA-2012-280421]
  3. Royal Society Industry Fellowship
  4. Diamond Light Source, UK [EE8542-1, NT12131-1]
  5. Synchrotron SOLEIL, France [20160076]
  6. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA [GUP 23649, GUP 26170]
  7. U.S. DOE [DE-ACO2-06CH11357]
  8. EPSRC [EP/K00588X/1, EP/R011001/1, EP/L019965/1, EP/L019884/1, EP/R031819/1, EP/L019825/1, EP/R011095/1, EP/N007638/1, EP/I02249X/1, EP/R011044/1, EP/K005804/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonic (cavitation) melt processing attracts considerable interest from both academic and industrial communities as a promising route to provide clean, environment friendly and energy efficient solutions for some of the core issues of the metal casting industry, such as improving melt quality and providing structure refinement. In the last 5 years, the authors undertook an extensive research programme into fundamental mechanisms of cavitation melt processing using state-of-the-art and unique facilities and methodologies. This overview summarises the recent results on the evaluation of acoustic pressure and melt flows in the treated melt, direct observations and quantitative analysis of cavitation in liquid aluminium alloys, in-situ and ex-situ studies of the nucleation, growth and fragmentation of intermetallics, and de-agglomeration of particles. These results provide valuable new insights and knowledge that are essential for upscaling ultrasonic melt processing to industrial level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据