期刊
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 154-166出版社
CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002
关键词
-
资金
- European Union (EU) FP7 project LIBERATION [311781]
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [841.11.001, 870.15.030, 040.11.577]
There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of nature based management practices, such as social acceptability of farming.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据