4.2 Article

Field grown transgenic Pm3e wheat lines show powdery mildew resistance and no fitness costs associated with high transgene expression

期刊

TRANSGENIC RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 9-20

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-018-0099-5

关键词

Wheat; Powdery mildew; Genetic engineering (GE); Field trial; Disease resistance

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_163260]
  2. Forschungskredit Grant from the University of Zurich [FK-15-098]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_163260] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pm3 from wheat encodes a nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat type of receptor and confers resistance to powdery mildew caused by the fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici(Bgt). Each of the 17 functional Pm3 alleles identified so far confers resistance to a distinct spectrum of Bgt isolates. Variant Pm3e has been found in wheat donor line W150 and differs only by two amino acids from the non-functional variant Pm3CS. In order to evaluate the capability of Pm3e to provide powdery mildew field resistance, we generated transgenic Pm3e lines by biolistic transformation of the powdery mildew susceptible spring wheat cultivar Bobwhite. Field trials conducted during four field seasons in Switzerland showed significant and strong powdery mildew resistance of the Pm3e transgenic lines, whereas the corresponding biological sister lines, not containing the transgene, were severely powdery mildew infected. Thus Pm3e alone is responsible for the strong resistance phenotype. The field grown transgenic lines showed high transgene expression and Pm3e protein accumulation with no fitness costs on plant development and yield associated with Pm3e abundance. Line E#1 as well as sister line E#1 showed delayed flowering due to somaclonal variation. The study shows the capability of Pm3e in providing strong powdery mildew field resistance, making its use in wheat breeding programs very promising.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据