4.7 Review

Solventless microextraction techniques for water analysis

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 321-331

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.013

关键词

SPME; SBSE; ITEX-DHS; SPDE; PAL SPME Arrow; GC-MS; Water analysis; Pollutants

资金

  1. Evonik Industries AG, Essen
  2. REMEDIATE (Improved decision-making in contaminated land site investigation and risk assessment) MarieCurie Innovation Training Network
  3. European Union [643087]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [643087] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microextraction techniques have been proven to provide similar or better results in terms of sensitivity and reproducibility in comparison to liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE). Furthermore, the high time efficiency and decreased workload leads to a higher sample throughput. In this review the state of the art of some of these techniques, namely solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE), in-tube extraction-dynamic headspace (ITEX-DHS) and PAL SPME Arrow is shown. Furthermore, their benefits and drawbacks are discussed, together with their applicability to the analysis of water samples. To that end, the latest publications of microextraction techniques for a selection of regulated compound classes (chlorophenols (CPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, short-chained chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)) are compared. Finally, a guideline for choosing the best microextraction technique for different analytical needs is described. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据