4.6 Article

Aspergillus and progression of lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis

期刊

THORAX
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 125-131

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211550

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [9937868, 351541]
  2. Children's Hospital Foundation Queensland, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The impact of Aspergillus on lung disease in young children with cystic fibrosis is uncertain. Aims To determine if positive respiratory cultures of Aspergillus species are associated with: (1) increased structural lung injury at age 5 years; (2) accelerated lung function decline between ages 5 years and 14 years and (3) to identify explanatory variables. Methods A cross-sectional analysis of association between Aspergillus positive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures and chest high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan findings at age 5 years in subjects from the Australasian Cystic Fibrosis Bronchoalveolar Lavage (AC FBAL) study was performed. A non-linear mixed-effects disease progression model was developed using FEV1% predicted measurements at age 5 years from the AC FBAL study and at ages 6-14 years for these subjects from the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry. Results Positive Aspergillus BAL cultures at age 5 years were significantly associated with increased HRCT scores for air trapping (OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.35 to 10.82). However, positive Aspergillus cultures were not associated with either FEV1% predicted at age 5 years or FEV1% predicted by age following adjustment for body mass index z-score and hospitalisation secondary to pulmonary exacerbations. Lung function demonstrated a non-linear decline in this population. Conclusion In children with cystic fibrosis, positive Aspergillus BAL cultures at age 5 years were associated contemporaneously with air trapping but not bronchiectasis. However, no association was observed between positive Aspergillus BAL cultures on FEV1% predicted at age 5 years or with lung function decline between ages 5 years and 14 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据