4.7 Article

Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (DμSPE) with graphene oxide as adsorbent for sensitive elemental analysis of aqueous samples by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)

期刊

TALANTA
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 162-170

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.044

关键词

Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction; Graphene oxide; LIES; Trace analysis; Liquid samples

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, (Spain) [CTQ2016-79991-R, BES-2012-058759]
  2. Regional Government of Valencia (Spain) [PROMETEO/2013/038]
  3. University of Alicante, (Spain) [UAUSTI16-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the combination of dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (D mu SPE) with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was evaluated for simultaneous preconcentration and detection of Zn, Cd, Mn, Ni, Cr and Pb in aqueous samples. Two adsorbent materials were tested in the microextraction step, namely graphene oxide and activated carbon. In both cases, the microextraction process consisted in the dispersion of a small quantity of adsorbent in the sample solution containing the analytes. However, while the use of activated carbon required a previous chelation of the metals, this step was avoided with the use of graphene oxide. After extraction, the analytes retained in the adsorbents were analysed by LIBS. Several experimental factors affecting the extraction of the metals (adsorbent amount, pH and extraction time) were optimized by means of the traditional univariate approach. Under optimum microextraction conditions, the analytical features of the proposed DOPE-LIBS methods were assessed, leading to limits of detection below 100 mu g kg(-1) and 50 mu g kg(-1) with the use of activated carbon and graphene oxide, respectively, as adsorbents in the DOPE process. Trueness evaluation of the most sensitive procedure was carried out by spike and recovery experiments in a real sample of tap water, leading to recovery values in the range 98-110%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据