4.7 Article

Surface-modified CeO2 coating with excellent thermal shock resistance performance and low infrared emissivity at high-temperature

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 559-566

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.058

关键词

CeO2; PEG 400 modification; Dispersity; Thermal shock resistance; Low infrared emissivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51802155, 51403102]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180443]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CeO2 filler modified by different content (0, 1, 5 and 10 wt%) of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 and the inorganic silicate binder were introduced for preparation of coatings with excellent thermal shock resistance performance and low infrared emissivity at high-temperature. The influences of PEG 400 content on phase structure and morphology of CeO2 powders, and hence on thermal shock resistance behavior and high-temperature infrared emissivity of the corresponding coatings were investigated deeply in this work. The results show that the crystal structure of CeO2 remains unchanged after modification of PEG 400. The dispersity of CeO2 particles is improved with content of modifier PEG 400 increasing from 0 wt% to 5 wt% while it gets worse with PEG 400 content further rising to 10 wt%. Thermal shock resistance of the corresponding coatings enhances from 4 cycles to 31 cycles by increasing PEG 400 content from 0 wt% to 5 wt% while diminishes significantly to 1 cycle with PEG 400 content of 10 wt%. Simultaneously, the minimum emissivity of 0.348 is achieved at 600 degrees C in the coating with 5 wt% of PEG 400. The results suggest that the coating with CeO2 modified by 5 wt% of PEG 400 is a promising candidate for high-temperature infrared stealth due to both excellent thermal shock resistance and low infrared emissivity at high temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据