4.7 Article

An importance learning method for non-probabilistic reliability analysis and optimization

期刊

STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 1255-1271

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-018-2128-7

关键词

Non-probabilistic reliability; Non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization; Convex model; Importance learning method; Kriging model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602076, 11502063]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1708085QA06]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment from Dalian University of Technology [GZ1702]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [JZ2018HGTB0231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the time-consuming computations incurred by nested double-loop strategy and multiple performance functions, the enhancement of computational efficiency for the non-probabilistic reliability estimation and optimization is a challenging problem in the assessment of structural safety. In this study, a novel importance learning method (ILM) is proposed on the basis of active learning technique using Kriging metamodel, which builds the Kriging model accurately and efficiently by considering the influence of the most concerned point. To further accelerate the convergence rate of non-probabilistic reliability analysis, a new stopping criterion is constructed to ensure accuracy of the Kriging model. For solving the non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization (NRBDO) problems with multiple non-probabilistic constraints, a new active learning function is further developed based upon the ILM for dealing with this problem efficiently. The proposed ILM is verified by two non-probabilistic reliability estimation examples and three NRBDO examples. Comparing with the existing active learning methods, the optimal results calculated by the proposed ILM show high performance in terms of efficiency and accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据