4.7 Article

Impact of 12/15-Lipoxygenase on Brain Injury After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

期刊

STROKE
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 520-523

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022325

关键词

blood-brain barrier; brain injury; lipoxygenase; oxidative stress; subarachnoid hemorrhage

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01NS049430, R21NS087165]
  2. American Heart Association [17GRNT33460100]
  3. Societe Francaise de Neurochirurgie and Zeiss
  4. Societe Francaise d'Anesthesie et Reanimation
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [SPE20150331891]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating form of stroke. Oxidative stress contributes to brain injury, but the mechanisms have been poorly studied. Here, we evaluated the role of 12/15-lipoxygenase (12/15-LOX), an enzyme known to cause cell death in ischemic stroke, on brain injury in a mouse model of SAH. Methods-C57Bl6 wild-type mice and Alox15 knockout mice were subjected to SAH using a direct blood injection technique. In SAH wild-type mice, half received the 12/15-LOX inhibitor ML351 and half received vehicle. Immunohistochemistry, brain edema, blood-brain barrier leakage and functional outcomes were assessed 1 and 3 days after SAH induction. Results-SAH led to increased 12/15-LOX in macrophages of the brain parenchyma, adjacent to the subarachnoid blood. Neuronal cell death after SAH was reduced by ML351 and in Alox15 knockout mice. Similarly, SAH induced brain edema, which was 12/15-LOX dependent. Finally, Alox15 gene knockout and inhibitor treatment in wild-type mice with SAH led to an improved behavioral outcome. Conclusions-12/15-LOX is overexpressed in macrophages after SAH in mice, and inhibition of the 12/15-LOX pathway decreases brain injury and improves neurological outcome. This study suggests 12/15-LOX as a novel therapeutic target to limit brain injury after SAH. Visual Overview-An online visual overview is available for this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据