4.7 Review

Concise Review: Human Pluripotent Stem Cells for the Modeling of Pancreatic beta-Cell Pathology

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 33-41

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2913

关键词

Pluripotent stem cells; Diabetes; beta-Cells; Genome editing; CRISPR; Pancreatic differentiation; Disease modeling

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [115797]
  3. European Union
  4. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  7. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  8. EFPIA
  9. JDRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic beta-cells are the only source of insulin. Disturbances in beta-cell development or function may thus result in insulin deficiency or excess, presenting as hyper- or hypoglycemia. It is increasingly evident that common forms of diabetes (types 1 and 2) are pathogenically heterogeneous. Development of efficient therapies is dependent on reliable disease models. Although animal models are remarkably useful research tools, they present limitations because of species differences. As an alternative, human pluripotent stem cell technologies offer multiple possibilities for the study of human diseases in vitro. In the last decade, advances in the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from diabetic patients, combined with beta-cell differentiation protocols, have resulted in the generation of useful disease models for diabetes. First disease models have been focusing on monogenic diabetes. The development of genome editing technologies, more advanced differentiation protocols and humanized mouse models based on transplanted cells have opened new horizons for the modeling of more complex forms of beta-cell dysfunction. We present here the incremental progress made in the modeling of diabetes using pluripotent stem cells. We discuss the current challenges and opportunities of these approaches to dissect beta-cell pathology and devise new pharmacological and cell replacement therapies. Stem Cells 2019;37:33-41

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据