4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Investigation of the atomization mechanism of gold nanoparticles in graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2018.10.004

关键词

Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry; Nanoparticle analysis; Atomization mechanism; Signal interpretation

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft]
  2. DFG [LE 2457/8-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) has been introduced as a new tool to distinguish between silver ions and nanoparticles using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) by evaluation of the newly presented parameters atomization delay (t(ad)) and atomization rate (k(at)). Moreover, sizing of NPs in aqueous suspensions by GFAAS measurement was shown by several authors. However, the atomization mechanism of NPs in GFAAS and possible differences to ionic salts introduced into the graphite furnace has not yet been investigated. In this work, therefore we study the newly introduced parameters and further peak characteristics, like full width at half maximum (FWHM), peak asymmetry and appearance time (t(Ap)) and their concentration-dependent trends applying ionic gold Au(III) standards as well as 5- to 100-nm-sized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), respectively. Interpretation of the data helps to enlighten the atomization mechanism and kinetic of the atom release process of AuNPs in comparison to ionic Au(III). Ionic Au(III) shows a rising trend in t(ad) with increasing gold concentrations, whereas t(ad) is nearly constant for AuNPs over this concentration range. On the other hand, AAS peaks of ionic Au(III) reveal constant t(Ap), while AuNPs show a shift in appearance time. Moreover, peak asymmetry differs for ionic Au(III) in comparison to AuNPs. These differences suggest different atomization mechanisms involved in the evaporation of gold atoms introduced into the graphite furnace as either ionic Au(III) solution or AuNP hydrosol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据