4.6 Article

Parameter optimization of solar air collectors with holes on baffle and analysis of flow and heat transfer characteristics

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 878-887

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.075

关键词

Solar air collector; Parameter optimization; Numerical simulation; Orthogonal test

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705446]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China [E2015203271]
  3. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, China [GZKF-201716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to improve the thermal performance of baffle-type solar air collector (BSAC) by opening holes on baffle based on the principle of windbreak walls. Small jets were created when fluid flowing out of the holes, which can weaken or blow away the vortexes behind baffle avoiding the generation of hot spots, and the bypass effect caused by these holes can reduce the flow resistance simultaneously. Moreover, these small jets strengthen the mixing and flow disturbance, which can enhance the heat transfer between the airflow and absorber plate leading to efficiency improvement. In this paper, the impact of hole parameters on thermal performance of BSAC was studied by orthogonal numerical tests. The analysis of variance shows that the mutual interaction among the factors of opening hole is insignificant and the influence of inlet flow rate and the hole size on collector efficiency is significant. The optimal parameter combination under different flow rates was obtained. When the inlet flow rate is 0.0044, 0.0088, and 0.0132 kg.s(-1).m(-2), the optimal collector efficiencies is 69.63%, 81.71%, and 86.83% respectively. A numerical comparison was made between the BSAC with and without holes on baffle, which explains the reason why the improved BSAC can promote the thermal efficiency and reduce the flow resistance simultaneously, providing a theoretical basis for the performance improvement of BSAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据