4.3 Article

Reproducibility of the durometer and myoton devices for skin stiffness measurement in healthy subjects

期刊

SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 289-293

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12646

关键词

durometer; intraclass correlation coefficient; myoton; sclerosis; stiffness

资金

  1. United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences R&D (CSRD) Service [IK2 CX001785]
  2. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Research Immersion
  3. National Institutes of Health - NCI [CA090625]
  4. Baltic-American Freedom Foundation
  5. Archimedes Foundation Kristjan Jaak Scholarship
  6. Vanderbilt Medical Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Clinical assessment of skin stiffness is unreliable in many applications. The durometer, an industrial device to measure hardness, has previously been applied in scleroderma. The Myoton is a noninvasive handheld device for assessing soft tissue biomechanical parameters. Materials and Methods We evaluated the reproducibility of both devices in six healthy subjects in the volar forearm, dorsal forearm, upper arm, shin, and calf bilaterally. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used as a measure of reproducibility among three observers. Results The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of overall stiffness for the Myoton was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.00] and 0.71 [0.39-1.00] for the durometer. Coefficient of variation (CV) for the Myoton was 6.4% [range 1.3-12.1] and 7.6% [range 4.4-13.8] for the durometer. Myoton and durometer values had a Pearson correlation of 0.69. The intraobserver Myoton ICC was 0.89 [0.74-1.00] and CV 3.1% [range 1.6-5.0]. The 95% confidence minimal detectable change by the Myoton for a single observer is 32.4 N/m, which is 7.6% of the average subject's overall stiffness. Conclusion The Myoton demonstrated high reproducibility, particularly in the overall stiffness parameter, and merits further investigation to assess disease progression and treatment efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据