4.4 Article

Dynamic Response of a Combined Isolation Based Mega-Substructure under Bidirectional Near-Fault Ground Motions

期刊

SHOCK AND VIBRATION
卷 2018, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9501746

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578160]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Fujian Education Department [JA15050]
  3. Fujian Science and Technology Plan Project [2018Y0057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A typical megaframe structure has a high lateral stiffness and is excellent for high-rise structures. However, this high stiffness can lead to poor seismic response of a structure. Seismic isolation technology is a mature and cheap vibration control method that is used for vibration reduction in megaframes. This paper introduces a megaframe structure based on substructure combined isolation. The structure consists of two parts. The main body is a megaframe, and the substructure is the subframe with the combined isolation layer arranged at the bottom of the subframe. The seismic performance of this structure system was evaluated by performing shaking table tests of two megaframe model structures. The responses of the deformation, acceleration, and shear of the structure were measured. The dynamic behaviors of the structure with or without the combined isolation layer when exposed to single and bidirectional near-fault and far-fault ground motions with different peak values were investigated. The results showed that the combined isolation layer can reduce the bidirectional seismic response of the main frame and subframe. The acceleration, base shear, and displacement responses had similar vibration reduction trends for the two model structures, and the structural responses under bidirectional earthquake were generally greater than that under a single directional earthquake. The near-fault pulse effect increased the seismic response of the structure. The increase of the predominant period of ground motion also increased the seismic response of the structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据