4.7 Article

Dislocation-based plasticity and strengthening mechanisms in sub 20 nm lamellar structures in pearlitic steel wire

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 176-183

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.040

关键词

Sub-20 nm lamellar structure; Dislocation-based plasticity; Strengthening mechanisms; Strength-structure relationship; Pearlitic steel wire

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF86-5]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51261130091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tensile properties and the deformation microstructure of pearlitic steel (0.8 wt % C) have been quantified in wires drawn to strains in the range from 3.7 to 5.4, having a flow stress in the range from 3.5 to 4.5 GPa. With increasing strain the interlamellar spacing (ILS) decreases from about 20 to 10 nm and the thickness of the cementite lamellae decreases from about 2 nm to about 0.7 nm, representing a structure, which breaks up at large strains, decomposes and releases carbon to the ferrite lamellae. The dislocation density increases continuously with strain and reaches about 5 x 10(16) m(-2) at a strain of 5.4; the dislocations are stored as threading dislocations, as dislocation tangles and as cell boundaries with low to medium misorientation angles. An analysis of the evolution of microstructure and strength with increasing strain suggests that dislocation-based plasticity is a dominating mechanism in the wire and three strengthening mechanisms are applied: boundary strengthening, dislocation strengthening and solid solution hardening with their relative contributions to the total flow stress which change as the strain is increased. Based on linear additivity good correspondence between the calculated and the measured flow stress is observed over the strain range 0-5.4. However at large strains beyond 3.7 deviations are observed which are discussed in terms of the applied strength-structure relationships. (C) 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据