4.7 Article

Facile preparation of PbCrO4 and PbCrO4/Ag nanostructure as an effective photocatalyst for degradation of organic contaminants

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 79-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.018

关键词

PbCrO4; Nanostructures; Stabilization agent; Photocatalytic performance; Organic pollutant

资金

  1. council of Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)
  2. University of Kashan [159271/833990]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pure monoclinic lead chromate nanoparticles ware prepared via a new simple way with lead nitrate and chrome chloride as Pb and Cr sources. For the first time, nanostructured lead chromate was synthesized with utilizing triethylenepantamine as a new alkaline agent. The citric acid, succinic acid, maleic acid and benzene tri carboxylic acid as stabilization agent and capping agent in presence of ethylene glycol and propylene glycol as connecting agent were employed to prepare of the lead chromate. The as-prepared nanostructured PbCrO4 and PbCrO4/Ag was analyzed by UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), energy dispersive X-ray micro analysis (EDX), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). To examining the influence of various stabilization agents, connecting agent and alkaline agents on the morphology, grain size and photo catalytic performance of PbCrO4, different experiments were performed. The effects of various factors including kind of contamination, grain size ofPbCrO(4) nanostructures and pH on photocatalytic behavior of products was evaluated. Rhodamine B, methylene blue, methyl orange and murexide were used as pollutant model. It was observed that by using of PbCrO4/Ag nanostructure instead PbCrO4 nanoparticles the photocatalytic activity from 53 to 67 increased. Also by decreasing of pH from 7 to 5 destruction percentage of rhodamine B from 67 to 55 decreased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据