4.6 Article

Design and Modeling of a MEMS Dual-Backplate Capacitive Microphone with Spring-Supported Diaphragm for Mobile Device Applications

期刊

SENSORS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s18103545

关键词

capacitive microphone; dual backplate; FEM model; electret condenser microphones; spring-supported diaphragm; Sandia Ultra-Planar Multi-level MEMS Technology V (SUMMiT V) fabrication process

资金

  1. FORDECYT-CONACYT [115976]
  2. project PRODEP [231500]
  3. project PROINNOVA [231500]
  4. PFCE 2018 DES Tecnica Veracruz [30MSU0940B-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New mobile devices need microphones with a small size, low noise level, reduced cost and high stability respect to variations of temperature and humidity. These characteristics can be obtained using Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) microphones, which are substituting for conventional electret condenser microphones (ECM). We present the design and modeling of a capacitive dual-backplate MEMS microphone with a novel circular diaphragm (600 mu m diameter and 2.25 mu m thickness) supported by fifteen polysilicon springs (2.25 mu m thickness). These springs increase the effective area (86.85% of the total area), the linearity and sensitivity of the diaphragm. This design is based on the SUMMiT V fabrication process from Sandia National Laboratories. A lumped element model is obtained to predict the electrical and mechanical behavior of the microphone as a function of the diaphragm dimensions. In addition, models of the finite element method (FEM) are implemented to estimate the resonance frequencies, deflections, and stresses of the diaphragm. The results of the analytical models agree well with those of the FEM models. Applying a bias voltage of 3 V, the designed microphone has a bandwidth from 31 Hz to 27 kHz with 3 dB sensitivity variation, a sensitivity of 34.4 mV/Pa, a pull-in voltage of 6.17 V and a signal to noise ratio of 62 dBA. The results of the proposed microphone performance are suitable for mobile device applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据