相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The extent and causes of academic text recycling or 'self-plagiarism'
S. P. J. M. (Serge) Horbach et al.
RESEARCH POLICY (2019)
An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in PubMed and the Web of Science
Marion Schmidt
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2018)
The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing
Jamie L. Callahan
ORGANIZATION (2018)
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
S. P. J. M. (Serge) Horbach et al.
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2018)
More on Plagiarism in the Social Sciences
Brandli Stitzel et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY (2018)
Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity
E. D. Kharasch et al.
ANAESTHESIA (2018)
The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature
Serge P. J. M. Horbach et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?
Christian Hopp et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH (2017)
The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions
Pierre Azoulay et al.
RESEARCH POLICY (2017)
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles
Felicitas Hesselmann et al.
CURRENT SOCIOLOGY (2017)
Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals
J. B. Carlisle
ANAESTHESIA (2017)
Conceptualizing Fraudulent Studies as Viruses: New Models for Handling Retractions
Kathleen Montgomery et al.
MINERVA (2017)
Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige
Kanu Okike et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
Make peer review scientific
Drummond Rennie
NATURE (2016)
Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals
Solmaz Filiz Karabag et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND NATURE, 1945-1990
Melinda Baldwin
NOTES AND RECORDS-THE ROYAL SOCIETY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE (2015)
Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
Daniele Fanelli et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Reviewing post-publication peer review
Paul Knoepfler
TRENDS IN GENETICS (2015)
Emerging trends in peer review - a survey
Richard Walker et al.
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE (2015)
CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND NATURE, 1945-1990
Melinda Baldwin
NOTES AND RECORDS-THE ROYAL SOCIETY JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE (2015)
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
Vincent Lariviere et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks
Charisse R. Madlock-Brown et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2015)
Involving people with diabetes and the wider community in diabetes research: a realist review protocol
Janet Harris et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2015)
Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
Christopher D. Chambers
CORTEX (2013)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010
Tianwei He
SCIENTOMETRICS (2013)
A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science
Ludo Waltman et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2012)
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Ferric C. Fang et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2012)
Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation
Ulrich Poeschl
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE (2012)
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
Wolfgang Stroebe et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?
R. Grant Steen
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2011)
Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership
Jennifer Horner et al.
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH (2011)
Fear of the Unknown: Familiarity and Economic Decisions
H. Henry Cao et al.
REVIEW OF FINANCE (2011)
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
Marjan Bakker et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2011)
CrossCheck: an effective tool for detecting plagiarism
Helen (Yuehong) Zhang
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2010)
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Daniele Fanelli
PLOS ONE (2009)
Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction
M. A. G. van der Heyden et al.
NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL (2009)
Retraction rates are on the rise
Murat Cokol et al.
EMBO REPORTS (2008)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients
R Kaushal et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2001)
分享论文
