4.7 Article

Historical roasting of thallium- and arsenic-bearing pyrite: Current Tl pollution in the Riotinto mine area

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 648, 期 -, 页码 1263-1274

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.260

关键词

Thallium; Tl-jarosite; Riotinto mine; Environmental pollution; Tl XANES; Colloids

资金

  1. Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation [CTM2014-55321-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Samples of an open-air pyrite roasting heap from the 19th century in the Riotinto mine area (SW Spain) and surrounding sediments and soil along a seasonal surface runoff channel were analyzed to study thallium (Tl) phase transformations during historical roasting of Tl-bearing arsenian pyrite, secondary weathering processes, Tl dispersion and current environmental pollution. Results from Electron Probe Microanalyses (EPMA) indicate an even distribution of Tl in pyrite grains of an ore sample (22 mg kg(-1) total Tl), suggesting that Tl is incorporated in the pyrite structure rather than in discrete Tl-sulfide microparticles. The roasting residue (122 mg kg(-1) total Tl) consists mainly of hematite. EPMA suggested that Tl in the roasting residue and contaminated soil was co-occurring with Fe oxide particles, with a mean Tl point concentration of 0.12% in samples from the roasting residues. Total concentrations of Tl in soil samples decrease with distance from the roasting heap to 14 mg kg(-1). X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra collected on pyrite roasting residue and a soil sample suggest that most Tl is Tl(I) substituting K in jarosite. Sequential extractions show that most Tl (85-99%) in the soil and sediment samples is concentrated in the residual fraction and, thus, is rather strongly bound. Lastly, water extracts indicate that colloidal particles (i.e. <1 mu m size) may contribute to the dispersion of Tl around and away from the roasting heaps. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据