4.7 Review

Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for membrane-based water treatment and desalination

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 646, 期 -, 页码 1126-1139

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.348

关键词

Antifouling; Carbon nanotube membranes; Desalination; Electrochemical degradation; Functionalization; Water treatment

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [310421111]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778055]
  3. Chinese Government Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental applications of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have grabbed worldwide attentions due to their excellent adsorption capacities and promising physical, chemical and mechanical properties. The functionalization of CNTs, which involves chemical/physical modification of pristine CNTs with different types of functional groups, improves the capabilities of CNT for desalination and/or removals of waterborne contaminants. This paper intends to provide a comprehensive review of functional CNT materials (f-CNT) and their existing and potential applications in membrane-based water treatment and desalination processes, with focuses on critical evaluation of advances, knowledge gaps and future research directions. CNT nanocomposite membranes have been studied at bench scale to efficiently remove a variety of waterborne contaminants and salts, while future improvement is under way with development in CNT functionalization techniques. The CNT-based membrane applications are found to possess a variety of advantages, including improve water permeability, high selectivity and antifouling capability. However, their applications at full scale are still limited by their high cost. Finally, we highlight that f-CNT membranes with promising removal efficiencies for respective contaminants be considered for commercialization and to achieve holistic performance for the purpose of water treatment and desalination. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据