4.7 Article

Stochastic diffusion models to describe the evolution of annual heatwave statistics: A three-factor model with risk calculations

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 646, 期 -, 页码 670-684

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.158

关键词

Heatwaves; Climate change; Stochastic diffusion modelling; Risk; Uncertainty

资金

  1. Basque Government [GIC12/177-IT-399-13]
  2. Science and Innovation Ministry of Spain [ECO2015-68023]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Research Fellowship of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain [RYC-2013-13628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In view of risk assessments this paper proposes a stochastic diffusion model to characterise statistics of extreme events when climate-or environmental variables surpass critical thresholds. The proposed three-factor model captures trend and volatility of such statistics and could prove valuable for climate and environmental impact analysis in many systems such as human health, agriculture or ecology. The model supports decisions in view of lowering risks to acceptable levels. We illustrate the development of the model for heatwave impacts on human health in the context of climate change. We propose a generic model composed of three random processes characterising annual statistics of heatwaves: a Poisson process characterising the number of heatwaves, a Gamma process characterising mean duration and a truncated Gaussian process capturing mean excess temperature of heatwave days. Additionally, potential correlations between the three processes are taken into account. The model is calibrated with data obtained from a regional climate model for two cities in Spain. The suitability of the model for probabilistic analysis is tested with Monte Carlo simulations. We assess the time-dependent probability distributions of heatwave-related mortality and demonstrate how to obtain relevant risk metrics such as the 95th percentile and the average of the 5% of worst cases (ES (95%)). (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据