4.7 Article

Effects of mixed surfactants on the bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in crops and the bioremediation of contaminated farmlands

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 646, 期 -, 页码 1211-1218

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.349

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Agricultural soil; Mixed surfactants; Bio-available fraction; Bioaccumulation; Bioremediation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21520102009, 21621005]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB441106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the widespread contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in farmland, it is necessary to develop a technology to ensure the safety of agricultural productions and remediate the contaminated soils. In this study, a series of mixed surfactants were utilized to reduce the uptake of PAHs by crops in farming period and enhance the plant-microbe associated biodegradation in fallow period. During the farming period, the mixtures of cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTMAB) and Tween 80 were attached on soil by cationic-exchange and hydrogen bond, respectively, which increased soil organic matter to partition the bio-available fraction of PAHs. The maximum reduction of phenanthrene and pyrene was 88.6% and 94.9% for chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum coronarium L.), and 90.6% and 91.9% for raphanus (Raphanus sativus L.), respectively. During the fallow period, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) reduced the adsorption loss of Tween 80 on soil to enhance desorption of PAHs. The mixtures of SDBS and Tween 80 increased the water-soluble fraction of PAHs in soils, modified bacterial community structure, and enriched the functional genes involved cell motility and signal transduction. Removal efficiencies of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils were high to 86.7% and 90.7%. This systematic technology provided an effective solution to remediate and plant on PAH-contaminated farmlands. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据