4.8 Article

Universal protection against influenza infection by a multidomain antibody to influenza hemagglutinin

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 362, 期 6414, 页码 598-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaq0620

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R56 AI117675, R56 AI127371]
  2. Janssen
  3. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense [64047-LS-DRP. 02]
  4. Theme-based Research Scheme, Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong [T11-705/14N]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  6. National Cancer Institute [Y1-CO-1020]
  7. NIGMS [Y1-GM-1104, P41GM103393]
  8. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  9. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R56AI117675, UM1AI100663, R56AI127371, T32AI007354] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P41GM103393] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Broadly neutralizing antibodies against highly variable pathogens have stimulated the design of vaccines and therapeutics. We report the use of diverse camelid single-domain antibodies to influenza virus hemagglutinin to generate multidomain antibodies with impressive breadth and potency. Multidomain antibody MD3606 protects mice against influenza A and B infection when administered intravenously or expressed locally from a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector. Crystal and single-particle electron microscopy structures of these antibodies with hemagglutinins from influenza A and B viruses reveal binding to highly conserved epitopes. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that multidomain antibodies targeting multiple epitopes exhibit enhanced virus cross-reactivity and potency. In combination with adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery, they may provide an effective strategy to prevent infection with influenza virus and other highly variable pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据