4.2 Article

Inhibition of cardiac allograft rejection in mice using interleukin-35-modified mesenchymal stem cells

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sji.12750

关键词

heart transplantation; interleukin-35; mesenchymal stem cells; regulatory T cells

资金

  1. Tianjin Medical University Science Foundation [2014KYM03]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCYBJC26400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars [31400764]
  4. Tianjin City High School Science & Technology Found Planning Project [20130113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin-35 (IL-35) is a cytokine recently discovered to play a potent immunosuppressive role by intensifying the functions of regulatory T cells and inhibiting the proliferation and functions of T helper 1 and T helper 17 cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently emerged as promising candidates for cell-based immune therapy, and our previous study showed that IL-35 gene modification can effectively enhance the therapeutic effect of MSCs in vitro. In this study, we isolated adipose tissue-derived MSCs in vitro and infected them with lentiviral vectors overexpressing the IL-35 gene, thereby creating IL-35-MSCs. Subsequently, IL-35-MSCs were then injected into mice of the allogeneic heterotopic abdominal heart transplant model to determine their effect on allograft rejection. The results showed that IL-35-MSCs could continuously secrete IL-35 in vivo and in vitro, successfully alleviate allograft rejection and prolong graft survival. In addition, compared to MSCs, IL-35-MSCs showed a stronger immunosuppressive ability and further reduced the percentage of Th17 cells, increased the proportion of CD4(+) Foxp3(+) T cells, and regulated Th1/Th2 balance in heart transplant mice. These findings suggest that IL-35-MSCs have more advantages than MSCs in inhibiting graft rejection and may thus provide a new approach for inducing immune tolerance during transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据