4.6 Article

Serum progesterone concentration and live birth rate in frozen-thawed embryo transfers with hormonally prepared endometrium

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 472-480

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.026

关键词

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Hormonal replacement therapy; Live birth; Serum progesterone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research question: Is serum progesterone measurement on the day of embryo transfer associated with outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in cycles using hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) for endometrium preparation? Design: This single-centre retrospective study assessed the relationship between serum progesterone on embryo transfer day and live birth rates in 227 FET cycles. Endometrial preparation was performed by sequential administration of vaginal oestradiol until endometrial thickness was >7 mm, followed by transdermal oestradiol combined with 600 mg vaginal micronized progesterone. Results: Mean serum embryo transfer day progesterone was 11.4 ng/ml. Serum progesterone <10 ng/ml was observed in 37% of cycles and was associated with significantly lower pregnancy (34% versus 48%, P = 0.04) and live birth rates (17% versus 31%, P = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified serum embryo transfer day progesterone as a significant prognostic factor for live birth rate (odds ratio [OR]: 2.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-5.43]). Receiver operator curve analysis for live birth rates by serum progesterone levels on embryo transfer day gave an area under the curve of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.72). Conclusions: The data show that serum progesterone concentration is associated with live birth rate. This outlines the importance of measuring serum progesterone in FET with HRT although progesterone monitoring is not usually performed in routine practice. However, the optimal timing for measurement and further adaptive management in the presence of low values remain to be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据