4.4 Article

Follicular dynamics and changes in oestradiol-17β, progesterone and LH profiles following PGF2α induced oestrus in early and late ovulating Beetal goats

期刊

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 545-550

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rda.13392

关键词

Beetal goats; oestrus; ovulation; PGF(2 alpha)

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission, Pakistan [213-60800-2Av2-1, SRGP 554]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contents This study compares the factors associated with variable interval to oestrus and ovulation between early versus late ovulating goats following PGF(2 alpha) administration. The time of ovulation in Beetal goats (n = 38) was monitored through transrectal ultrasound at every 6 hr following a single dose of PGF(2 alpha) (experiment 1). Variations in oestrus and ovulation times were further explored through the changes in follicular dynamics, endocrine profiles and behaviour in another set of goats (n = 13) following single PGF(2 alpha) given randomly during the luteal phase (experiment 2). The ovulation time varied between 60 and 96 hr, and 57% of ovulations occurred by 72 hr following PGF(2 alpha) (experiment 1). Accordingly, the goats (n = 13) in the second experiment were retrospectively divided either into early and/or late ovulating, that is, <= 72 and/or >= 84 hr following PGF(2 alpha). The onset of oestrus, peak estradiol-17 beta concentration and LH surge after PGF(2 alpha) was first observed in early than late ovulating goats (p < 0.05). The goats ovulating early had larger follicle and smaller CL in diameter at the time of PGF(2 alpha) administration than those ovulating late (5.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.2 mm and 10 +/- 0.6 vs. 11.8 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively; p < 0.05). Likewise, plasma progesterone concentration tended to be lower (p = 0.087) in early than late ovulating goats. In conclusion, the size of dominant follicle and CL at the time of PGF(2a) determines the interval to ovulation following a single dose of PGF(2a) during the luteal phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据