4.7 Article

Optimization of 4th generation distributed district heating system: Design and planning of combined heat and power

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 371-387

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.068

关键词

4th generation; Cogeneration; Optimization; Distributed; CHP; Heat and power

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Concordia University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study applies a mathematical programming procedure to model the optimal design and planning of a new district which satisfies two features of the 4th generation district heating systems: energy reciprocity and on-site generation. The aim of the computational model is to investigate the effect of energy reciprocity (energy exchange among the buildings) as well as to find the best way to select the equipment among various candidates (capacities), the pipeline network among the buildings, and their electrical connections. The objective function includes the annualized overall capital and operation costs for the district along with the benefits of selling electricity to the grid. The distributed energy supply consists of heating, cooling, and power networks, several CHP technologies, solar array, chillers, and auxiliary boilers. The performance of the model for poly-generation was evaluated for designing the new part of Suurstoffi district situated in Risch Rotkreuz, Switzerland with seven residential and office complexes under four different scenarios. Allowing heat exchange among the buildings leads to 25% reduction in total annualized cost and 5% reduction in emission compared to the conventional districts. Removing the network and installation of PV and CHPs results in 9% reduction in emission and 11% reduction in cost. Simultaneous heat and electricity exchange results in a higher reduction in total annualized cost equal to 40% of the base scenario. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据