4.0 Article

Associations Between Self-Reported Symptoms and Gait Parameters Using In-Home Sensors in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

REHABILITATION NURSING
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 80-87

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000210

关键词

Gait variability; home monitoring; multiple sclerosis; symptoms

资金

  1. Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC)
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1 TR000448]
  3. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center
  4. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA091842]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive neurological disorder, characterized by exacerbations and remissions, often resulting in disability affecting multiple neurological functions. The purpose of this article was (1) to describe the frequencies of self-reported symptoms in a natural environment and (2) to determine characteristics and associations between self-reported symptoms and home gait parameters (speed, stride time, and stride length) at baseline and at 3 months in patients with MS. Methods Participants completed the self-report MS-Related Symptom Scale to measure symptoms. A three-dimensional depth imaging system (Foresite Healthcare) was used to measure gait parameters in the home environment. Results These data show significant correlations between the following symptoms: knee locking or collapsing, difficulty sleeping, depression, and anxiety with decreased number of average walks per day; however, the symptoms including trouble-making toilet: day and difficulty in starting urine were positively correlated with average walks per day. The symptom numbness was significantly correlated with decreased speed and decreased stride length. Discussion and Conclusions Our findings suggest that certain groups of symptoms were more frequently reported with certain gait parameters (stride time/speed) in persons with MS. Rehabilitation nurses can provide optimal care to prevent future decline in symptoms and gait.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据