4.6 Article

The challenges on the family unit faced by younger couples affected by prostate cancer: A qualitative study

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 329-335

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.4944

关键词

cancer; children; couples; dyad; family; LAPCD; oncology; prostate cancer; qualitative

资金

  1. Oxford Brookes University, (LAPCD study) - Movember Foundation
  2. Prostate Cancer UK [BO26/MO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe number of younger men being diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa; aged 65) is increasing. It is recognised that PCa and treatment side effects can have a significant impact on quality of life. This study explores the challenges faced by younger couples affected by PCa with dependent children (under 18years) or young adults (18-29years) in their families. MethodsTwenty-three men with PCa and their partners were interviewed (separately) by telephone. Participants were recruited from respondents to the life after prostate cancer diagnosis (LAPCD) national survey. Men were 3 to 5years postdiagnosis, and following a range of treatment pathways. Data were analysed using the Framework Approach. ResultsYounger couples affected by PCa felt challenged by issues relating to their parental role and the dynamics within the family. Five main themes emerged: difficult conversations about PCa diagnosis; parental perceptions of the impact of diagnosis on children; parental responses to the impact of PCa on the family; shielding, coping, and normalising strategies; and levels of support. ConclusionsA diagnosis of PCa can cause significant disruption to the family unit and the quality of life of its members. Support programmes offering guidance to children/young adults affected by PCa in their family, and addressing the concerns of parents may help families to better adapt. Encouraging clinical professionals to initiate conversations with younger couples about their children may be a way forward in directing appropriate support. Further research is needed to elucidate appropriate, effective supportive interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据