4.2 Article

Cortical structure abnormalities in females with conduct disorder prior to age 15

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 37-44

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.12.004

关键词

Conduct disorder; Structural MRI; Freesurfer; Cortical thickness; Surface area; Fusiform gyms

资金

  1. Mobilisering mot narkotika (Swedish National Drug Policy Coordinator)
  2. Stockholm Country Council
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  4. VINNOVA
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. Stockholm County Council
  7. Karolinska Institute
  8. Stanley Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among females, conduct disorder (CD) before age 15 is associated with multiple adverse outcomes in adulthood. The few existing structural neuroimaging studies of females with CD report abnormalities of gray matter volumes. The present study compared cortical thickness and surface area of young women with childhood/adolescent CD and healthy women to determine whether cortical abnormalities were present in adulthood and whether they were related to prior CD. Structural brain images from 31 women with CD and 25 healthy women were analyzed using FreeSurfer. Group differences between cortical thickness and surface area were assessed using cluster-wise corrections with Monte Carlo simulations. Women with prior CD, relative to healthy women, showed: (1) reduced cortical thickness in left fusiform gyrus extending up to entorhinal cortex and lingual gyrus; (2) reduced surface area in right superior parietal cortex; (3) increased surface area in left superior temporal gyrus, and right precentral gyrus. These differences remained significant after adjusting for past comorbid disorders, current symptoms of anxiety and depression, current substance use as well as maltreatment. The study suggests that among females, CD prior to age 15 is associated with cortical structure abnormalities in brain regions involved in emotion processing and social interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据