4.5 Review

Facial Erythema of Rosacea - Aetiology, Different Pathophysiologies and Treatment Options

期刊

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
卷 96, 期 5, 页码 579-+

出版社

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-2335

关键词

rosacea; erythema; brimonidine; patho-physiology; vasculature; treatment

资金

  1. Galderma
  2. LaRoche Posay
  3. GSK
  4. Leo Pharm
  5. Bayer
  6. Regeneron
  7. Pfizer
  8. Avon
  9. L'Oreal
  10. LaRoche Pasay
  11. Noxxon
  12. Galderma Laboratories LP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rosacea is a common chronic skin condition that displays a broad diversity of clinical manifestations. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms of the 4 subtypes are not completely elucidated, the key elements often present are augmented immune responses of the innate and adaptive immune system, and neurovascular dysregulation. The most common primary feature of all cutaneous sub-types of rosacea is transient or persistent facial erythema. Perilesional erythema of papules or pustules is based on the sustained vasodilation and plasma extravasation induced by the inflammatory infiltrates. In contrast, transient erythema has rapid kinetics induced by trigger factors independent of papules or pustules. Amongst the current treatments for facial erythema of rosacea, only the selective alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist brimonidine 0.33% topical gel (Mirvaso (R)) is approved. This review aims to discuss the potential causes, different pathophysiologies and current treatment options to address the unmet medical needs of patients with facial erythema of rosacea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据