4.6 Article

Observations of vertical mixing in autumn and its effect on the autumn phytoplankton bloom

期刊

PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2019.01.001

关键词

Seasonal cycle; Breakdown of stratification; SML dynamics; Primary production; Autumn phytoplankton bloom; Critical depth; Long-term observations; North-West European Shelf

资金

  1. Defra as a part of the Shelf Sea Biogeochemistry strategic research programme [NE/K002007/1, NE/K002058/1, NE/K001701/1]
  2. NERC
  3. Defra as a part of the Shelf Sea Biogeochemistry strategic research programme, through Cefas grant [NE/K001884/1]
  4. NERC [NE/K001957/1, NE/K001701/1, NE/K002058/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work examines the seasonal cycle of vertical density structure and its influence on primary production in a temperate shelf sea, with a particular focus on the breakdown of stratification in autumn. We do this by combining new, high resolution observations of water column structure, meteorological forcing, nitrate and chlorophyll fluorescence collected between March 2014 and July 2015 on the North West European Shelf. Our results challenge the generally accepted assumption that convection dominates over wind driven mixing resulting in seasonal breakdown of stratification. Furthermore we found, that vertical mixing in autumn not only transformed the vertical density structure but also the vertical structure of chlorophyll biomass and surface nutrients. The subsurface chlorophyll maximum was eroded and a vertically homogeneous profile of chlorophyll biomass established itself above the pycnocline. This increased mixing also led to replenishment of surface nitrate concentrations, which supported an autumn phytoplankton bloom. While the significance of phytoplankton blooms in autumn has previously not been well quantified, we argue that these can act as a significant contributor to the seasonal drawdown of carbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据