4.7 Review

Precision in the development of neocortical architecture: From progenitors to cortical networks

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 77-95

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.01.003

关键词

Histogenesis; Cerebral cortex; Human; Rodent; Connectivity; Excitatory neurons; Genetics; Cell type specification; Experience; Circuits; Thalamus; Specification; Reprogranuning; Microcircuit; Neural network; Axon guidance; Synaptic specificity; Synaptogenesis; Refinement

资金

  1. Simms/Mann Chair in Developmental Neurogenetics
  2. WM Keck Chair in Neurogenetics
  3. NIH [R01 MH067842]
  4. Children's Hospital Los Angeles Research Career Development Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Of all brain regions, the 6-layered neocortex has undergone the most dramatic changes in size and complexity during mammalian brain evolution. These changes, occurring in the context of a conserved set of organizational features that emerge through stereotypical developmental processes, are considered responsible for the cognitive capacities and sensory specializations represented within the mammalian Glade. The modern experimental era of developmental neurobiology, spanning 6 decades, has deciphered a number of mechanisms responsible for producing the diversity of cortical neuron types, their precise connectivity and the role of gene by environment interactions. Here, experiments providing insight into the development of cortical projection neuron differentiation and connectivity are reviewed. This current perspective integrates discussion of classic studies and new findings, based on recent technical advances, to highlight an improved understanding of the neuronal complexity and precise connectivity of cortical circuitry. These descriptive advances bring new opportunities for studies related to the developmental origins of cortical circuits that will, in turn, improve the prospects of identifying pathogenic targets of neurodevelopmental disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据