4.8 Article

Noncanonical role for the binding protein in substrate uptake by the MetNI methionine ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) transporter

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811003115

关键词

ATP Binding Cassette transporter; alternating access transport mechanism; methionine transporter; transinhibition

资金

  1. Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Beckman Institute at Caltech
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  6. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR001209]
  7. Center for Environmental Microbial Interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Escherichia coli methionine ABC transporter MetNI exhibits both high-affinity transport toward L-methionine and broad specificity toward methionine derivatives, including D-methionine. In this work, we characterize the transport of D-methionine derivatives by the MetNI transporter. Unexpectedly, the N229A substrate-binding deficient variant of the cognate binding protein MetQ was found to support high MetNI transport activity toward D-selenomethionine. We determined the crystal structure at 2.95 angstrom resolution of the ATP.S-bound MetNIQ complex in the outward-facing conformation with the N229A apo MetQ variant. This structure revealed conformational changes in MetQ providing substrate access through the binding protein to the transmembrane translocation pathway. MetQ likely mediates uptake of methionine derivatives through two mechanisms: in the methionine-bound form delivering substrate from the periplasm to the transporter (the canonical mechanism) and in the apo form by facilitating ligand binding when complexed to the transporter (the noncanonical mechanism). This dual role for substrate-binding proteins is proposed to provide a kinetic strategy for ABC transporters to transport both high-and low-affinity substrates present in a physiological concentration range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据