4.8 Article

Geomagnetic polar minima do not arise from steady meridional circulation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717454115

关键词

geodynamo; polar magnetic minima; polar vortex; gyroscopic pumping; flow magnetic field interactions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Geophysics Program [EAR-1547269]
  2. Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (INCITE) program [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observations of the Earth's magnetic field have revealed locally pronounced field minima near each pole at the core-mantle boundary (CMB). The existence of the polar magnetic minima has long been attributed to the supposed large-scale overturning circulation of molten metal in the outer core: Fluid upwells within the inner core tangent cylinder toward the poles and then diverges toward lower latitudes when it reaches the CMB, where Coriolis effects sweep the fluid into anticyclonic vortical flows. The diverging near-surface meridional circulation is believed to advectively draw magnetic flux away from the poles, resulting in the low intensity or even reversed polar magnetic fields. However, the interconnections between polar magnetic minima and meridional circulations have not to date been ascertained quantitatively. Here, we quantify the magnetic effects of steady, axisymmetric meridional circulation via numerically solving the axisymmetric magnetohydrodynamic equations for Earth's outer core under the magnetostrophic approximation. Extrapolated to core conditions, our results show that the change in polar magnetic field resulting from steady, large-scale meridional circulations in Earth's outer core is less than 3% of the background field, significantly smaller than the similar to 100% polar magnetic minima observed at the CMB. This suggests that the geomagnetic polar minima cannot be produced solely by axisymmetric, steady meridional circulations and must depend upon additional tangent cylinder dynamics, likely including nonaxisymmetric, time-varying processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据