4.7 Article

Investigation of powder flow within a pharmaceutical tablet press force feeder - A DEM approach

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 616-632

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.040

关键词

Pharmaceutical tableting; Force feeder; Powder flow; Tablet quality attributes; Segregation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Powder flow in rotary tablet presses, constituting one of the key machines in the tablet production chain, is today still considered as a black box. In this study, a discrete element approach is presented to assess the powder flow in a lab-scale rotary tablet press with a force feeder consisting of three paddle wheels of different shapes. Process conditions are chosen same as in reality and a model direct compression formulation with a poly-disperse particle size distribution is considered. Different means of process insights, e.g. tablet mass and API content, mass holdup in the different paddle wheel zones, particles' velocity, particle's segregation and mixing within the feeder, and residence time analysis, are presented. A direct link between the powder flow in the force feeder and the tablet quality attributes is established. Over the production time the particles filled into the dies have traveled different distances in the force feeder during which their particle properties might change. Thus over the die height differences in terms of particle size and particle properties due to particle attrition and over lubrication are identified. This intra-die variability is a direct consequence of the de-mixing in the force feeder and the shear forces exerted by the different paddle wheels. Modifications in terms of force feeder design, e.g. paddle wheel arrangement and blade shapes, are suggested as they could decrease the de-mixing side effect and enhance product quality. Finally, process understanding could be improved which helps in pharmaceutical development and increases the patient's safety. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据