4.8 Article

The Role of Gβ Protein in Controlling Cell Expansion via Potential Interaction with Lipid Metabolic Pathways

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 179, 期 3, 页码 1159-1175

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.01312

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture/Agricultural and Food Research Initiative (NIFA/AFRI) [2015-67013-22964]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOS-1557942, MCB-1714693]
  3. National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (NSF REU) [NSF-DBI-REU-1156581]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterotrimeric G-proteins influence almost all aspects of plant growth, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants, likely via their interaction with specific effectors. However, the identity of such effectors and their mechanism of action are mostly unknown. While investigating the roles of different G-protein subunits in modulating the oil content in Camelina (Camelina sativa), an oil seed crop, we uncovered a role of G beta proteins in controlling anisotropic cell expansion. Knockdown of G beta genes causes reduced longitudinal and enhanced transverse expansion, resulting in altered cell, tissue, and organ shapes in transgenic plants during vegetative and reproductive development. These plants also exhibited substantial changes in their fatty acid and phospholipid profiles, which possibly leads to the increased oil content of the transgenic seeds. This increase is potentially caused by the direct interaction of G beta proteins with a specific patatin-like phospholipase, pPLAIII delta. Camelina plants with suppressed G beta expression exhibit higher lipase activity, and show phenotypes similar to plants overexpressing pPLAIII delta, suggesting that the G beta proteins are negative regulators of pPLAIII delta. These results reveal interactions between the G-protein-mediated and lipid signaling/metabolic pathways, where specific phospholipases may act as effectors that control key developmental and environmental responses of plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据