4.7 Article

Using the rapid A-Ci response (RACiR) in the Li-Cor 6400 to measure developmental gradients of photosynthetic capacity in poplar

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 740-750

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13436

关键词

leaf development; photosynthesis; photosynthetic capacity; poplar; rapid A-C-i response (RACiR)

资金

  1. NSF EPSCoR [IIA-1301346]
  2. NSF Division of Graduate Education [DGE-1321851]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Fulbright Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid A-C-i response (RACiR) technique alleviates limitations of measuring photosynthetic capacity by reducing the time needed to determine the maximum carboxylation rate (V-cmax) and electron transport rate (J(max)) in leaves. Photosynthetic capacity and its relationships with leaf development are important for understanding ecological and agricultural productivity; however, our current understanding is incomplete. Here, we show that RACiR can be used in previous generation gas exchange systems (i.e., the LI-6400) and apply this method to rapidly investigate developmental gradients of photosynthetic capacity in poplar. We compared RACiR-determined V-cmax and J(max) as well as respiration and stomatal conductance (g(s)) across four stages of leaf expansion in Populus deltoides and the poplar hybrid 717-1B4 (Populus tremula x Populus alba). These physiological data were paired with leaf traits including nitrogen concentration, chlorophyll concentrations, and specific leaf area. Several traits displayed developmental trends that differed between the poplar species, demonstrating the utility of RACiR approaches to rapidly generate accurate measures of photosynthetic capacity. By using both new and old machines, we have shown how more investigators will be able to incorporate measurements of important photosynthetic traits in future studies and further our understanding of relationships between development and leaf-level physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据