4.7 Article

Floral plasticity: Herbivore-species-specific-induced changes in flower traits with contrasting effects on pollinator visitation

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 1882-1896

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13520

关键词

Brassica nigra (black mustard); flower colour; flower morphology; flower rewards; flower volatiles; herbivore-induced plant responses; phenotypic plasticity; plant defence; plant-mediated interactions; specificity

资金

  1. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [831.14.004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to antagonists can affect other community members such as mutualists, conferring potential ecological costs associated with inducible plant defence. For flowering plants, induction of defences to deal with herbivores can lead to disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Current knowledge on the full extent of herbivore-induced changes in flower traits is limited, and we know little about specificity of induction of flower traits and specificity of effect on flower visitors. We exposed flowering Brassica nigra plants to six insect herbivore species and recorded changes in flower traits (flower abundance, morphology, colour, volatile emission, nectar quantity, and pollen quantity and size) and the behaviour of two pollinating insects. Our results show that herbivory can affect multiple flower traits and pollinator behaviour. Most plastic floral traits were flower morphology, colour, the composition of the volatile blend, and nectar production. Herbivore-induced changes in flower traits resulted in positive, negative, or neutral effects on pollinator behaviour. Effects on flower traits and pollinator behaviour were herbivore species-specific. Flowers show extensive plasticity in response to antagonist herbivores, with contrasting effects on mutualist pollinators. Antagonists can potentially act as agents of selection on flower traits and plant reproduction via plant-mediated interactions with mutualists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据