4.7 Article

Lotuslactone, a non-canonical strigolactone from Lotus japonicus

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 200-205

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.10.034

关键词

Lotus japonicus; Fabaceae; Lotuslactone; Strigolactone; Gigaspora margarita; Glomeromycotina; Phelipanche ramosa; Orobanche minor; Striga hermonthica; Orobanchaceae

资金

  1. fund of Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Science and Technology Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K05452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root exudates from Lotus japonicus were found to contain at least three different hyphal branching-inducing compounds for the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Gigaspora margarita, one of which had been previously identified as (+)-5-deoxystrigol (5DS), a canonical strigolactone (SL). One of the two remaining unknown hyphal branching inducers was purified and named lotuslactone. Its structure was determined as methyl (E)-2-(3-acetoxy-2-hydroxy-7-methyl-l-oxo-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydroazulen-2-yl)-3-(((R)-4-methyl-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-yl)oxy)acrylate, by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy, and HR-ESI- and EI-MS. Although lotuslactone, a non canonical SL, contains the AB-ring and the enol ether-bridged D-ring, it lacks the C-ring and has a seven-membered cycloheptadiene in the A-ring part as in medicaol, a major SL of Medicago truncatula. Lotuslactone was much less active than 5DS, but showed comparable activity to methyl carlactonoate (MeCLA) in inducing hyphal branching of G. margarita. Other natural non-canonical SLs including avenaol, heliolactone, and zealactone (methyl zealactonoate) were also found to be moderate to weak inducers of hyphal branching in the AM fungus. Lotuslactone strongly elicited seed germination in Phelipanche ramosa and Orobanche minor, but Striga hermonthica seeds were 100-fold less sensitive to this stimulant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据