4.7 Article

First results on nucleon resonance photocouplings from the γ p→ π+π- p reaction

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 788, 期 -, 页码 371-379

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.013

关键词

Two pion photoproduction; Resonance photocouplings; Baryon state

资金

  1. Chilean Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. French Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA)
  8. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
  9. Physics Department at Moscow State University
  10. Ohio University
  11. University of South Carolina
  12. United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  13. National Research Foundation of Korea
  14. Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  15. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  16. STFC [ST/T002077/1, ST/P004458/1, ST/L00478X/2, ST/P004385/1, ST/P004385/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first experimental measurements of the nine 1-fold differential cross sections for the gamma p ->pi(+)pi(-) p reaction, obtained with the CLAS detector at Jefferson Laboratory. The measurements cover the invariant mass range of the final state hadrons from 1.6 GeV < W < 2.0 GeV. For the first time the photocouplings of all prominent nucleon resonances in this mass range have been extracted from this exclusive channel. Photoproduction of two charged pions is of particular importance for the evaluation of the photocouplings for the Delta(1620)1/2(-) , Delta(1700)3/2(-) , N(1720)3/2(+), and Delta(1905)5/2(+) resonances, which have dominant decays into the pi pi N final states rather than the more extensively studied single meson decay channels. (C) 2018 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据