4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Rare Earth Doping of Topological Insulators: A Brief Review of Thin Film and Heterostructure Systems

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201800726

关键词

antimony telluride; bismuth telluride; heterostructure; MBE; rare earth doping; topological insulators

资金

  1. John Fell Oxford University Press (OUP) Research Fund
  2. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [312483]
  3. DARPA MESO [N66001-11-1-4105]
  4. Army Research Laboratories
  5. EPSRC
  6. ISIS/STFC
  7. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes
  8. Department of Defense
  9. VPGE of Stanford University
  10. Diamond Light Source
  11. ESRF
  12. ALBA
  13. ILL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic topological insulators (MTIs) are a novel materials class in which a topologically nontrivial electronic band structure coexists with long-range ferromagnetic order. The ferromagnetic ground state can break time-reversal symmetry, opening a gap in the topological surface states whose size is dependent on the magnitude of the magnetic moment. Doping with rare earth ions is one way to introduce higher magnetic moments into a material, however, in Bi2Te3 bulk crystals, the solubility limit is only a few percent. Using molecular beam epitaxy for the growth of doped (Sb,Bi)(2)(Se,Te)(3) TI thin films, high doping concentrations can be achieved while preserving their high crystalline quality. The growth, structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of Dy, Ho, and Gd doped TI thin films will be reviewed. Indeed, high magnetic moments can be introduced into the TIs, which are, however, not ferromagnetically ordered. By making use of interfacial effects, magnetic long-range order in Dy doped Bi2Te3, proximity-coupled to the MTI Cr:Sb2Te3, has been achieved. Clearly, engineered MTI heterostructures offer new possibilities that combine the advantageous properties of different layers, and thus provide an ideal materials platform enabling the observation new quantum effects at higher temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据