4.7 Review

New insights on the regulation of cancer cachexia by N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 117-134

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.12.001

关键词

N-3 PUFAs; Tumor; Inflammation; Proinflammatory cytokines; Proteolysis; Weight loss

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level of Personnel (CAPES), Brazil
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil
  4. Dean's Office for Post-graduate Studies and Research of the Cruzeiro do Sul University, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that develops during malignant tumor growth. Changes in plasma levels of several hormones and inflammatory factors result in an intense catabolic state, decreased activity of anabolic pathways, anorexia, and marked weight loss, leading to cachexia development and/or accentuation. Inflammatory mediators appear to be related to the control of a highly regulated process of muscle protein degradation that accelerates the process of cachexia. Several mediators have been postulated to participate in this process, including TNF-alpha, myostatin, and activated protein degradation pathways. Some interventional therapies have been proposed, including nutritional (dietary, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation), hormonal (insulin), pharmacological (clenbuterol), and nonpharmacological (physical exercise) therapies. Omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid, are recognized for their anti-inflammatory properties and have been used in therapeutic approaches to treat or attenuate cancer cachexia. In this review, we discuss recent findings on cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in inflammation in the cancer cachexia syndrome and the effectiveness of n-3 PUFAs to attenuate or prevent cancer cachexia. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据