4.7 Review

Pharmacological targeting of RAS: Recent success with direct inhibitors

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 503-511

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.10.021

关键词

RAS inhibitor; Cancer; Effector interaction; Nucleotide exchange; GTPase; Monobody; CAAX motif

资金

  1. United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [1I01BX002095]
  2. NIH [CA201717, CA212608]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA212608, R01CA116708, R21CA201717] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. Veterans Affairs [I01BX002095] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RAS has long been viewed as undruggable due to its lack of deep pockets for binding of small molecule inhibitors. However, recent successes in the development of direct RAS inhibitors suggest that the goal of pharmacological inhibition of RAS in patients may soon be realized. This review will discuss the role of RAS in cancer, the approaches used to develop direct RAS inhibitors, and highlight recent successes in the development of novel RAS inhibitory compounds that target different aspects of RAS biochemistry. In particular, this review will discuss the different properties of RAS that have been targeted by various inhibitors including membrane localization, the different activation states of RAS, effector binding, and nucleotide exchange. In addition, this review will highlight the recent success with mutation-specific inhibitors that exploit the unique biochemistry of the RAS(G12C) mutant. Although this mutation in KRAS accounts for 11% of all KRAS mutations in cancer, it is the most prominent KRAS mutant in lung cancer suggesting that G12C-specific inhibitors may provide a new approach for treating the subset of lung cancer patients harboring this mutant allele. Finally, this review will discuss the involvement of dimerization in MS function and highlight new approaches to inhibit RAS by specifically interfering with RAS:RAS interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据